Now three links are responsible for the criminal process: the police, the prosecutor's office and the court.
The police should identify crimes, identify the persons involved, collect evidence.
The prosecutor is obliged to give an independent assessment of the evidence collected, to prevent violations of citizens' rights, to prevent the involvement of bona fide citizens in criminal proceedings, to support the prosecution in court.
The court is to consider complaints about the actions of the authorities and make a final verdict on the case.
Thus, the main procedural decisions must be coordinated with the prosecutor: recognition of a suspect, qualification of his act, qualification of a criminal offense, interruption of the pre-trial investigation, termination, indictment. Otherwise, they will be considered illegal. Coordination of key procedural decisions makes it possible to protect the constitutional rights of not only the victim, but also the suspect. And this is only the first stage.
Such a system is practiced in many developed countries of the world, it provides for such an order when the police identify crimes, identify those involved, collect evidence. The prosecutor gives an independent assessment of the evidence collected, ensures that the rights of citizens are not violated, that conscientious people are not involved in the criminal process, supports the prosecution in court.
The advantages of electronic coordination of key procedural decisions cannot be overestimated. The operational interaction of the prosecutor with the pre-trial investigation body eliminates unnecessary bureaucratic delays, and the investigators' time is saved, there is no need to go to the prosecutor with the case. In addition, it allows the management of the investigation bodies and the supervisory prosecutor to monitor the progress of the investigation of criminal cases online, minimizes manipulation, which eliminates the possibility of falsification.
In general, over the past period, within the framework of the three-tier model, the Prosecutor's office of the Enbekshikazakh district agreed on 1975 decisions.