Assessment of identified corruption risks
Department of Emergency Situations of the city of Nur-Sultan
The assessment of identified corruption risks is associated with the most significant risks that can lead to undesirable
consequences in the Department of Dangerous Situations in the city
Nur-Sultan.
Assessment risks in terms of probability or frequency of their assessment
and statistics. Risk level calculation
Risk level = probability * impact
Risk probability assessment criteria
Ball
Meaning
Frequency of implementation
Sharpness of implementation
1
Very rarely
Single events registered in the activity of the object of analysis over the past 5 years.
The event can be implemented in very rare cases or with a probability of implementation of up to 1%.
2
Rarely
The analysis of poorly infected or infected objects of activity was registered during the last 2 years.
The event can be implemented in rare cases or with a probability of implementation from 1% to 10%.
3
From time to time
The event was religious
analysis of the activity of the object during the last year.
The probability of risk realization is from 11% to 25%.
4
Often
The event was related to the analysis of objects during the last six months.
The probability of risk realization is from 26% to 50%.
5
Very often
The event was religious
during the last six months repeatedly.
Sharpness of implementation
events are very high from 50% to 100%.
Risk assessment criteria
Ball
index
General characteristics of the consequences
Complince/Security Compliance
1
Insignificant
Absence - any negative consequences in case of risk realization
Minor violation of regulatory requirements, absence of employees to bring employees to administrative and/or other responsibility
Absence of violation of the rights and interests of individuals and legal entities.
2
Notable
Consequences of alienation
implementation of exposure risks
Minor violation of regulatory functions. Warnings about the possible collection of fines from employees for the analysis of objects. disclosure of information about possible collection of fines, penalties, penalties and identification of other persons belonging to the objects of analysis.
3
Large
Consequences of alienation
risk realizations are high, but can be completely fixed
Repeated violation of regulatory rights that can play golf, penalties, penalties and other players. Collection of fines from the analysis of objects.
Violations of the rights and interests of individuals and legal entities.
4
Critical
Consequences of alienation
the realization of the risk is very high, but can be corrected to the degree of severity
Serious violation of regulatory fears, natural resources, which are responsible for the payment of fines, penalties, penalties, etc. Bringing employees of the object of analysis to administrative or criminal responsibility.
Violation of the rights and interests of individuals and legal entities.
5
Catastrophic
The consequences of implementing the risk are very high and cannot be corrected. The risk has uncompensated consequences.
Extreme violation of regulatory authorities or several financial players, which entailed large fines, penalties, penalties and other payments, as well as the withdrawal of issued income (if any). Repeated involvement of employees in administrative/criminal and/or other liability.
Violation of the rights and interests of individuals and legal entities.Risk map of the Department for Dangerous Situations in the city of Nur-Sultan
The desired zone is the probability of the probability of occurrence or the average probability of exposure to the level of risk in the object of analysis;