THEY ARE DIFFERENT, BUT AKIDA IS ONE!

There is an opinion that Salafism should be divided into sober (moderate) and radical. They base their opinion on the fact that there are two groups of Salafism that recognize the principles of a secular state and believe that joining the armed forces is anti-Sharia, and also believe that the state should live only according to Sharia law, and if not, then turn to weapons.
⠀
Therefore, the first group is considered serious, because it is not against our state structure, and they say that our struggle should be directed against the radical group of the second group.
⠀
I think you need to be very careful when breaking down salutes into these categories. This is due to the fact that both of the above groups have the same literature and aqeedah. There is only a difference between them in some political positions.
⠀
Changing attitudes and beliefs on a religious basis is usually impossible. But, as you know, political views and positions change in accordance with the requirements of interests and the situation.
⠀
Therefore, even if we conditionally agree to divide Salafism into sober and radical in terms of whether or not to go to armed activity, then from the point of view of the idea of dividing into two such groups is generally a mistake. Not only is this a mistake, it blames the state and society for the problem of making decisions and measures related to socialism.
⠀
Because none of the Islamic Aqidah and law schools take this for granted. In addition, they are considered heresies by megatsunami and Adami.
⠀
In the next turn, they call to fight for the purification of the Islamic world from such heresy.
⠀
E. Shokai